When the debate was entering the basic question - do we want a reasonable agreement or an irrational war? - it turned again towards the judicial forms, the question about the question of the plebiscite. 

On October 2nd, I will vote YES with the joy that the end of war makes me feel and the hope to build a conuntry based on agreement, dissent, and dialogue. 

The Integral Rural Reform proposed in the peace accords reiterates the State's commitment since the 1991 Constitution. 

While traveling to Brazil, I felt why the Olympics are splendid. However, I confirmed how humanity has not been able to generate any advances in the protection of human rights during the construction of this mega-events.

The paradox about the plebiscite is that the decision over our war, which has been essentially rural, will probably depend on the urban vote, which is the majority.

August 24th, 2016 will forever remain in our generation's mind. The emotion was widespread, whether it was of joy and delight or of profound outrage. But no one will ever be the same after that announcement.

It is not the most brief volume.

People living in the streets are citizens with full rights and are our neighbors in the city. 

When will we stop talking about the daily news and turn to the urgent discussion?