\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/demanda_para_proteger_el_derecho_a_la_intimidad_en_el_marco_del_nuevo_codigo_de_policia-300x201.png\")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n Dejusticia Files Suit to Protect the Right to Privacy Under the New Police Code in Colombia<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Mariluz Barrag\u00e1n<\/a>, Maria Paula \u00c1ngel<\/a>, Mauricio Albarrac\u00edn<\/a>
\n | Jan 29, 2017
\n <\/h5>\nDejusticia filed a lawsuit before the Constitutional Court, arguing that several articles of Colombian Law 1801 of 2016 (Police Code) violate the right to privacy.<\/p>\n
Read more →<\/a>
\n
\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/dejusticia_realizo_intervencion_ciudadana_en_demanda_al_codigo_de_policia_en_articulos_que_regulan_derecho_a_la_protesta_social-300x165.png\")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Dejusticia intervenes in lawsuit against Police Code in articles that regulate the right to protest<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Mariluz Barrag\u00e1n<\/a>, Sebasti\u00e1n Lalinde Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez<\/a>, C\u00e9sar Rodr\u00edguez Garavito<\/a>
\n | Dec 12, 2016
\n <\/h5>\n Congress acted unconstitutionally when it issued the new police code because it attempted to regulate social protest through the wrong legislative channels.
\n Read more →<\/a>
\n
\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/intervencion_rodrigo_uprimny_en_audiencia_reforma_de_equilibrio_de_poderes-300x182.png\")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Rodrigo Uprimny Intervnes in Hearing Regarding the Balance of Powers Reform<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Dejusticia<\/a>
\n | Apr 15, 2016
\n <\/h5>\nLast March 30th there was a hearing about the complaint presented by the Nation’s Public Prosecutor, Eduardo Montealegre against the Balance of Powers Reform. This was Rodrigo Uprimny’s contribution.<\/p>\n
Read more →<\/a>
\n
\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/intervencion_ciudadana_a_favor_de_los_cambios_introducidos_por_la_reforma_de_equilibrio_de_poderes_en_materia_de_reeleccion_presidencial-300x179.png\")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Citizen Intervention in Favor of Changed Introduced by the Balance of Powers Reform regarding Presidential Re-election<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Diana Isabel G\u00fciza G\u00f3mez<\/a>, Sebasti\u00e1n Lalinde Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez<\/a>, C\u00e9sar Rodr\u00edguez Garavito<\/a>
\n | Dec 16, 2015
\n <\/h5>\nThe Balance of Powers Reform excluded in regards to presidential re-election the other mechanisms of constitutional reform that are included in the Constitution: legislative act and constitutional referendum of a governmental initiative. Dejusticia argues that this is not unconstitutional. <\/p>\n
Read more →<\/a>
\n
\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/es_inconstitucional_el_nuevo_modelo_de_gobierno_judicial_adoptado_por_el_acto_legislativo_02_de_2015_o_reforma_de_equilibrio_de_poderes_intervencion_de_rodrigo_uprimny_en_la_audiencia_publica_ante_la_corte_constitucional-300x177.png\")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Is the new judicial governance model adopted by the Legislative Act 02 of 2015 or “Balance of Powers Reform” constitutional? Rodrigo Uprimny intervenes in public hearing before the Constitutional Court<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Mauricio Albarrac\u00edn<\/a>, Diana Isabel G\u00fciza G\u00f3mez<\/a>
\n | Nov 3, 2015
\n <\/h5>\nOn September 9th, 2015 Rodrigo Uprimny participated in a public hearing called by the Constitutional Court during the process of assessing the constitutionality of the Legislative Act 02 of 2015 or the “balance of powers reform.” In his intervention, Rodrigo Uprimny argues that the balance of power reform did not replace the fundamental pillar of judicial independence by modifying the 1991 Constitution’s model of judicial governance.<\/p>\n
Read more →<\/a>
\n
\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/intervencion_ante_corte_constitucional_sobre_normas_del_servicio_militar_obligatorio_y_su_aplicacion_a_personas_trans.png\")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Intervention before the Constitutional Court Regarding Legal Regulations on Obligatory Military Service and Its Application to Trans* People<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Diana Isabel G\u00fciza G\u00f3mez<\/a>, Paola Molano Ayala<\/a>, Nathalia Sandoval Rojas<\/a>
\n | Jul 24, 2015
\n <\/h5>\nDejusticia intervened in a lawsuit arguing the unconstitutional nature of laws that regulate military service for trans people. For the plaintiffs these laws ignore their gender identity. Dejusticia has asked the Court to declare itself inhibited from releasing a substantive ruling.<\/p>\n
Read more →<\/a> <\/p>\n\n Challenge to Francisco Javier Ricaurte G\u00f3mez’s appointment as a judge of the High Judiciary Council for violation of article 126 of the Constitution<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Paula Rangel Garz\u00f3n<\/a>, Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes<\/a>
\n | Jan 24, 2013
\n <\/h5>\n
\n | Jan 29, 2017
\n <\/h5>\n
Dejusticia filed a lawsuit before the Constitutional Court, arguing that several articles of Colombian Law 1801 of 2016 (Police Code) violate the right to privacy.<\/p>\n
Read more →<\/a> Congress acted unconstitutionally when it issued the new police code because it attempted to regulate social protest through the wrong legislative channels. Last March 30th there was a hearing about the complaint presented by the Nation’s Public Prosecutor, Eduardo Montealegre against the Balance of Powers Reform. This was Rodrigo Uprimny’s contribution.<\/p>\n Read more →<\/a> The Balance of Powers Reform excluded in regards to presidential re-election the other mechanisms of constitutional reform that are included in the Constitution: legislative act and constitutional referendum of a governmental initiative. Dejusticia argues that this is not unconstitutional. <\/p>\n Read more →<\/a> On September 9th, 2015 Rodrigo Uprimny participated in a public hearing called by the Constitutional Court during the process of assessing the constitutionality of the Legislative Act 02 of 2015 or the “balance of powers reform.” In his intervention, Rodrigo Uprimny argues that the balance of power reform did not replace the fundamental pillar of judicial independence by modifying the 1991 Constitution’s model of judicial governance.<\/p>\n Read more →<\/a> Dejusticia intervened in a lawsuit arguing the unconstitutional nature of laws that regulate military service for trans people. For the plaintiffs these laws ignore their gender identity. Dejusticia has asked the Court to declare itself inhibited from releasing a substantive ruling.<\/p>\n Read more →<\/a> <\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Dejusticia intervenes in lawsuit against Police Code in articles that regulate the right to protest<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Mariluz Barrag\u00e1n<\/a>, Sebasti\u00e1n Lalinde Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez<\/a>, C\u00e9sar Rodr\u00edguez Garavito<\/a>
\n | Dec 12, 2016
\n <\/h5>\n
\n Read more →<\/a>
\n
\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Rodrigo Uprimny Intervnes in Hearing Regarding the Balance of Powers Reform<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Dejusticia<\/a>
\n | Apr 15, 2016
\n <\/h5>\n
\n
\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Citizen Intervention in Favor of Changed Introduced by the Balance of Powers Reform regarding Presidential Re-election<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Diana Isabel G\u00fciza G\u00f3mez<\/a>, Sebasti\u00e1n Lalinde Ord\u00f3\u00f1ez<\/a>, C\u00e9sar Rodr\u00edguez Garavito<\/a>
\n | Dec 16, 2015
\n <\/h5>\n
\n
\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Is the new judicial governance model adopted by the Legislative Act 02 of 2015 or “Balance of Powers Reform” constitutional? Rodrigo Uprimny intervenes in public hearing before the Constitutional Court<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Mauricio Albarrac\u00edn<\/a>, Diana Isabel G\u00fciza G\u00f3mez<\/a>
\n | Nov 3, 2015
\n <\/h5>\n
\n
\n
\n <\/a><\/p>\n\n Intervention before the Constitutional Court Regarding Legal Regulations on Obligatory Military Service and Its Application to Trans* People<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Diana Isabel G\u00fciza G\u00f3mez<\/a>, Paola Molano Ayala<\/a>, Nathalia Sandoval Rojas<\/a>
\n | Jul 24, 2015
\n <\/h5>\n\n Challenge to Francisco Javier Ricaurte G\u00f3mez’s appointment as a judge of the High Judiciary Council for violation of article 126 of the Constitution<\/a>
\n <\/h2>\n\n By Paula Rangel Garz\u00f3n<\/a>, Rodrigo Uprimny Yepes<\/a>
\n | Jan 24, 2013
\n <\/h5>\n