{"id":21621,"date":"2017-01-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-01-12T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/"},"modified":"2017-03-30T19:50:12","modified_gmt":"2017-03-31T00:50:12","slug":"the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/","title":{"rendered":"The State Council&#8217;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bogot\u00e1 D.C, 12 de enero de 2017. Las organizaciones defensoras de derechos humanos y derechos de las mujeres firmantes aclaran que el <strong>fallo del Consejo de Estado mantiene vigente la Circular 003 de abril de 2013 de la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud,<\/strong> por medio de la cual se dan directrices a las EPS, cl\u00ednicas y hospitales para la realizaci\u00f3n de procedimientos dirigidos a la <strong>Interrupci\u00f3n Voluntaria del Embarazo-IVE.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>De hecho, <strong>por primera vez el Consejo de Estado reconoce que la Interrupci\u00f3n Voluntaria del Embarazo es un derecho fundamental y que el Estado es responsable de garantizar su acceso de manera integral, oportuna, con calidad y eficacia.<\/strong> En palabras del propio Consejo de Estado: \u201clo resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en la sentencia C-355 de 2006 y en la abundante jurisprudencia de tutela que se ha ocupado del asunto, <strong>no dejan duda sobre la existencia en Colombia del derecho fundamental a la IVE de las mujeres que se encuentran en los tres supuestos definidos por la Corte.<\/strong> Derecho fundamental que cuya efectividad est\u00e1 directamente ligada con la responsabilidad del Estado en materia de salud, por lo cual las garant\u00edas de su disfrute dependen del cumplimiento por parte de las autoridades de su obligaci\u00f3n de asegurar el acceso a servicios de salud prestados de manera integral, oportuna, con calidad y eficacia\u201d (Subrayado fuera del texto original).<\/p>\n<p>En su decisi\u00f3n, el Consejo de Estado afirma que temas como la objeci\u00f3n de conciencia no deber\u00edan ser parte de la circular (p\u00e1g.190 y ss) pues, seg\u00fan su interpretaci\u00f3n, la prohibici\u00f3n de la objeci\u00f3n de conciencia institucional establecida en varias sentencias de la Corte Constitucional no puede asumirse como una regla general que la Superintendencia pudiera regular. Pese a ello, <strong>el Consejo de Estado no estableci\u00f3 que la objeci\u00f3n de conciencia institucional est\u00e9 permitida, con lo cual ning\u00fan prestador de servicios de salud privado o p\u00fablico, EPS del r\u00e9gimen subsidiado o contributivo o secretar\u00eda de salud en Colombia puede hacer uso de esta figura.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>As\u00ed, la objeci\u00f3n de conciencia sigue siendo individual, no colectiva ni institucional.<\/strong> Independientemente de que una prestadora de salud tenga dentro de su personal m\u00e9dicos objetores de conciencia, la EPS est\u00e1 en la obligaci\u00f3n de garantizar el acceso a la IVE dentro de su red de servicios y en caso de que no practiquen las Interrupciones Voluntarias del Embarazo est\u00e1n obligados a remitir a la mujer que lo solicita a otros prestadores que s\u00ed la practiquen.<\/p>\n<p>La Circular 003 de 2013 de la Superintendencia de Salud se mantiene firme, con lo cual esta entidad <strong>puede investigar y hacer labor de vigilancia a las entidades que no presten los servicios de IVE en los t\u00e9rminos establecidos por ley.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Las entidades de salud NO pueden imponer obst\u00e1culos a las mujeres que solicitan un aborto como pedir juntas m\u00e9dicas, ex\u00e1menes de medicina legal, permisos de los familiares, entre otros.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Organizaciones firmantes:<\/strong><br \/> -Centro de derechos reproductivos<br \/> -Cat\u00f3licas por el derecho a decidir en Colombia<br \/> -Dejusticia<br \/> -La mesa por la vida y la salud de las mujeres<br \/> -Profamilia<br \/> -Women&#8217;s link worldwide<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><strong>Mayor informaci\u00f3n:<\/strong><br \/> Carolina Due\u00f1as Orozco<br \/> Women&#8217;s Link Worldwide<br \/> Cel. +57 301 550 7330<br \/> c.duenas@womenslinkworldwide.org<\/p>\n<p>Carolina Mila<br \/> Dejusticia<br \/> cmila@dejusticia.org<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The high court, which for the first time recognizes the voluntary interruption of pregnancy as a fundamental right, also did not authorize the objection of institutional conscience for clinics or hospitals.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":36363,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1613,1607],"tags":[2268,2330],"class_list":["post-21621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anti-discrimination","category-judiciary","tag-abortion-ive","tag-consejo-de-estado","subcategory-gender-discrimination","post-scope-aaa-not-blog","post-scope-both-international-national"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.9 (Yoast SEO v25.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The State Council&#039;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services - Dejusticia<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State Council&#039;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The high court, which for the first time recognizes the voluntary interruption of pregnancy as a fundamental right, also did not authorize the objection of institutional conscience for clinics or hospitals.&nbsp;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-01-12T05:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-31T00:50:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"968\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"345\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dejusticia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":[\"Article\",\"NewsArticle\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb\"},\"headline\":\"The State Council&#8217;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-12T05:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-31T00:50:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\"},\"wordCount\":565,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg\",\"keywords\":[\"Abortion \/ IVE\",\"Consejo de Estado\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Issue-Anti-discrimination\",\"Issue-Judiciary\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"copyrightYear\":\"2017\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\",\"name\":\"The State Council's decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services - Dejusticia\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-12T05:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-31T00:50:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg\",\"width\":968,\"height\":345},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State Council&#8217;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/\",\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"description\":\"Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"Dejusticia\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/dejusticia\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCbwnwY8oIpHCug4R3KhjewQ\/feed\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb\",\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dejusticia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/author\/admin-dejusticia\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The State Council's decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services - Dejusticia","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The State Council's decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services","og_description":"The high court, which for the first time recognizes the voluntary interruption of pregnancy as a fundamental right, also did not authorize the objection of institutional conscience for clinics or hospitals.&nbsp;","og_url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/","og_site_name":"Dejusticia","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/","article_published_time":"2017-01-12T05:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-31T00:50:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":968,"height":345,"url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dejusticia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@dejusticia","twitter_site":"@dejusticia","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dejusticia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":["Article","NewsArticle"],"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/"},"author":{"name":"Dejusticia","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb"},"headline":"The State Council&#8217;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services","datePublished":"2017-01-12T05:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-31T00:50:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/"},"wordCount":565,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg","keywords":["Abortion \/ IVE","Consejo de Estado"],"articleSection":["Issue-Anti-discrimination","Issue-Judiciary"],"inLanguage":"en-US","copyrightYear":"2017","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/","name":"The State Council's decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services - Dejusticia","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg","datePublished":"2017-01-12T05:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-31T00:50:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/el_fallo_del_consejo_de_estado_no_cambio_las_reglas_para_la_prestacion_de_servicios_de_abortos_seguros_y_oportunos.jpeg","width":968,"height":345},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/the-state-councils-decision-did-not-change-the-rules-for-safe-and-timely-abortion-services\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The State Council&#8217;s decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/","name":"Dejusticia","description":"Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization","name":"Dejusticia","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"Dejusticia"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/","https:\/\/x.com\/dejusticia","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCbwnwY8oIpHCug4R3KhjewQ\/feed"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb","name":"Dejusticia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dejusticia"},"url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/author\/admin-dejusticia\/"}]}},"views":219,"translations":[{"en":{"translation_id":"7892","language_code":"en","element_id":"21621","source_language_code":"es","element_type":"post_post","original":"0","post_title":"The State Council's decision did NOT change the rules for safe and timely abortion services","post_status":"publish"},"es":{"translation_id":"7891","language_code":"es","element_id":"21620","source_language_code":null,"element_type":"post_post","original":"1","post_title":"El fallo del Consejo de Estado NO cambi\u00f3 las reglas para la prestaci\u00f3n de servicios de abortos seguros y oportunos","post_status":"publish"}}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21621\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/36363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}