{"id":56643,"date":"2019-05-17T20:01:56","date_gmt":"2019-05-18T01:01:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/?p=56643"},"modified":"2019-05-21T14:03:10","modified_gmt":"2019-05-21T19:03:10","slug":"santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/","title":{"rendered":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) administers justice according to the terms of the Colombian Constitution. Its decisions must be respected, even though they can be criticized and controverted through other respective channels. We are aware that the JEP works under political conditions inherent in a society in transition and therefore must make decisions based on novel and complex rules.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts. First, the case of &#8220;Jes\u00fas Santrich&#8221; was decided on the basis of multiple rounds of robust deliberation, which led to a divided vote in the Review Chamber (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secci\u00f3n de Revisi\u00f3n<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) \u2013 three magistrates in favor and two against withholding the extradition. Second, on the same day as this decision, the JEP reissued the arrest warrants issued by the Attorney General\u2019s Office against alias &#8220;El Paisa,&#8221; \u00a0one of the FARC\u2019s main commanders, to appear before the JEP. Third, the JEP has been consistently making decisions on extradition requests; out of 58 requests, the JEP has permitted the extradition of 43 people charged with various crimes, including drug trafficking. Finally, the guarantee of non-extradition does not generate impunity because, in any case, the allegations against Jes\u00fas Santrich must be further investigated and adjudicated, if necessary.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The guarantee of non-extradition for former FARC combatants implies a great deal of complexities that have generated divergent positions in favor and against the decision, as there is neither a consensus on the standard of evidence to be applied, nor the scope of the judges\u2019 powers to issue and evaluate other evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Review Section convincingly states that the evidence provided by the United States and by the Office of the Attorney General is, according to Colombian law, unlawful, irrelevant or insufficient to determine the date of the activities in question. However, in the dissenting opinions, two justices provide reasonable arguments regarding the standard of proof and the duty to gather and evaluate additional evidence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/caso-santrich-dejusticia-defiende-y-respeta-la-autonomia-e-independencia-de-la-jep\/\">Read<\/a> our statement on the Santrich case in Spanish<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We believe that in cases related to the guarantee of non-extradition, the highest burden of proof should be applied, and if there is doubt, the Section should refrain from approving the extradition until the evidence which would allow them to resolve the doubt is collected or gathered. In this manner, it would guarantee that in the face of limited or insufficient evidence, the suspect would remain in Colombia at the disposal of the JEP and is able to respond to accusations of crimes they may be accused of in order to satisfy the rights to truth, justice, and reparations of the victims of the armed conflict.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the face of this controversy, Dejusticia calls on the Appeals Section (<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Secci\u00f3n de Apelaciones<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">) of the JEP to clarify the special rules on evidentiary matters which apply to the guarantee of non-extradition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Finally, we reject the Colombian Attorney General\u2019s contempt of this judicial decision. Instead of fulfilling his constitutional duties of continuing to investigate the case, Mart\u00ednez decided to resign, thereby promoting a deinstitutionalization of the judicial system and confirming his lack of collaboration with the administration of justice for peace.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the face of this controversy, Dejusticia calls on the Appeals Section (Secci\u00f3n de Apelaciones) of the JEP to clarify the special rules on evidentiary matters which apply to the guarantee of non-extradition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":56644,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1769,1611],"tags":[2434,1905,4264,4858,4251],"class_list":["post-56643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-media-advocacy","category-transitional-justice","tag-acuerdo-de-paz","tag-fiscalia","tag-gobierno","tag-ivan-duque","tag-jep","subcategory-blog-post","subcategory-highlight","medium-dejusticia-en","post-scope-aaa-not-blog","post-scope-national-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v25.9 (Yoast SEO v25.9) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) - Dejusticia<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-05-18T01:01:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-05-21T19:03:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@dejusticia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dejusticia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb\"},\"headline\":\"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-18T01:01:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-21T19:03:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\"},\"wordCount\":556,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Acuerdo de paz\",\"Fiscal\u00eda\",\"Gobierno\",\"Iv\u00e1n Duque\",\"JEP\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Area-Media Advocacy\",\"Issue-Transitional Justice\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"copyrightYear\":\"2019\",\"copyrightHolder\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\",\"name\":\"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) - Dejusticia\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2019-05-18T01:01:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-05-21T19:03:10+00:00\",\"description\":\"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/\",\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"description\":\"Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":[\"NGO\",\"ResearchOrganization\"],\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"Dejusticia\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/dejusticia\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCbwnwY8oIpHCug4R3KhjewQ\/feed\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Anti-Discrimination\",\"Rule of Law\",\"Environmental Justice\",\"Economic Justice\",\"Transitional Justice\",\"Drug Policy\",\"Judicial System\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb\",\"name\":\"Dejusticia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dejusticia\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/author\/admin-dejusticia\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) - Dejusticia","description":"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)","og_description":"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/","og_site_name":"Dejusticia","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/","article_published_time":"2019-05-18T01:01:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-05-21T19:03:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dejusticia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@dejusticia","twitter_site":"@dejusticia","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dejusticia","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/"},"author":{"name":"Dejusticia","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb"},"headline":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)","datePublished":"2019-05-18T01:01:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-21T19:03:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/"},"wordCount":556,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg","keywords":["Acuerdo de paz","Fiscal\u00eda","Gobierno","Iv\u00e1n Duque","JEP"],"articleSection":["Area-Media Advocacy","Issue-Transitional Justice"],"inLanguage":"en","copyrightYear":"2019","copyrightHolder":{"@id":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/#organization"}},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/","url":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/","name":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) - Dejusticia","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg","datePublished":"2019-05-18T01:01:56+00:00","dateModified":"2019-05-21T19:03:10+00:00","description":"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal, which is demonstrated by the following facts.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/Postal_DJS_190517-02-1024x683-1.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"Contrary to what some sectors have argued, there is no evidence that there is impunity in this tribunal."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/santrich-case-dejusticia-defends-and-respects-the-autonomy-and-independence-of-the-special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jep\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/","name":"Dejusticia","description":"Centro de Estudios de Derecho, Justicia y Sociedad","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":["NGO","ResearchOrganization"],"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#organization","name":"Dejusticia","url":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/logo-v1-dejusticia-MC.svg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"Dejusticia"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Dejusticia\/","https:\/\/x.com\/dejusticia","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCbwnwY8oIpHCug4R3KhjewQ\/feed"],"knowsAbout":["Anti-Discrimination","Rule of Law","Environmental Justice","Economic Justice","Transitional Justice","Drug Policy","Judicial System"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/8630a2f9d0e02352708c4f6dc099b9cb","name":"Dejusticia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.dejusticia.org\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e200ca9dac804a359439fdf7dea7bc1ef04f54f576ce735b6bad2ae534d6ab4?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dejusticia"},"url":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/author\/admin-dejusticia\/"}]}},"views":360,"translations":[{"en":{"translation_id":"31713","language_code":"en","element_id":"56643","source_language_code":"es","element_type":"post_post","original":"0","post_title":"Santrich Case: Dejusticia Defends and Respects the Autonomy and Independence of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP)","post_status":"publish"},"es":{"translation_id":"31690","language_code":"es","element_id":"56583","source_language_code":null,"element_type":"post_post","original":"1","post_title":"Caso Santrich: Dejusticia defiende y respeta la autonom\u00eda e independencia de la JEP","post_status":"publish"}}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56643\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/56644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/develop.dejusticia.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}