Skip to content
Column

The Duty to Resign

The Judge Pretelt’s denial to resign for the grave accusations levied against him raises a question, which is abstract but relevant not only in this case, but also many other similar cases: does a public servant’s duty to resign exist or not in these type of circumstance?

Read More
Column

Multiculturalism or “Apartheid”?

I do not share the deluge of personal attacks agains Senator Paloma Valencia for her unfortunate proposal to split the Cauca Department in two: “one indigenous department so that they can strike, protest, and invade, and one department dedicated to development, where we can invest in infrastructure, promote investment, and where there can be decent work for its inhabitants.”

Read More
Column

U.S. Success in Colombia?

The potential success of the peace process will be hard won, not through U.S. foreign assistance in the War on Drugs or the War on Terror, but through the effort and sacrifices of millions of Colombians, over many years.

Read More
Column

The Court in Its Labyrinth

The accusations against Justice Pretelt and ex-Justices Rojas and Escobar of the Constitutional Court (CC) are very serious and cannot be brushed under the carpet. It is right that it should generate a strong citizen rejection and that we demand that there be more transparency, definition of responsibilites, and adoption of structural reforms. But it is necessary to distinguish between possible individual transgressions and the CC’s institutional problems.

Read More
Column

Law and Ethics

Societies that constantly experience scandals, like ours, suffer from a type of collective squizofrenia. Each story of corruption produces two opposite reactions: while some, the moralists, throw up their hands in horror and clamer for exemplary punishments, others, the cynics, shrug their shoulders and say that nothing has happened until there’s a final conviction. 

Read More
Column

Preserve the Court

There are two ways of seeing the justified citizen and media indignation in response to the serious accusations against Judge Jorge Pretelt and the ex-Judges Rodrigo Escobar and Alberto Rojas. And two corresponding forms of navigating out of the Constitutional Court’s crisis. 

Read More
Post

Helena Alviar’s intervention in the VII Encounter of the Constitutional Jurisdiction

On October 10th-12th, 2011, the VII Encounter of the Constitutional Jurisdiction. This time, the Constitutional Court commemorated the 20th anniversary of the 1991 Constitution, in an event called “Constitutional dialogues with the world.”

This encounter was attended by two founding members of Dejusticia: Rodrigo Uprimny and Helena Alviar.

Read More
Post

Rodrigo Uprimny’s intervention in the VII Encounter of the Constitutional Jurisdiction

On October 10th-12th, 2011, the VII Encounter of the Constitutional Jurisdiction was held in the city of Bogotá. This time, the Constitutional Court commemorated the 20th anniversary of the 1991 Constitution, in an event called “Constitutional dialogues with the world.”

This encounter was attended by two founding members of Dejusticia: Rodrigo Uprimny and Helena Alviar.

Read More
Post

Secular state, scientific uncertainties, and abortion

Defenders of abortion criminalization in all circumstances depart from three assumptions: i) that every fertilized egg is a person; ii) that, therefore, abortion is unjustifiable, since it destroys a human being and is equivalent to murder, and iii) that therefore abortion should be illegal in all cases to protect human life.

Read More
Post

Rich and unequal

The 2011 national human development report from PNUD was just emitted. It states once again that we don’t distribute things well enough in Colombia. Not a novelty. It confirms that we are one of the most unequal countries in the world with a Gini index of income inequality of 0.58 and 0.85 for rural property, where 1 is absolute inequality.

Read More
Post

Top Secret

The bill of intelligence and counterintelligence whose constitutionality is currently under review of the Court and in which a group of organizations intend to intervene, considered legitimate to reserve from the public eye all the information produced by entities such as the DAS for the modest sum of 30 years.

Read More
Powered by swapps
Scroll To Top