Skip to content
Post

The Constitutional Court and Control of Presidential Extraordinary Powers in Colombia

The paper analyzes the attempts of Colombian Constitutional Court to control the abuse of presidential emergency powers in the last decade. After describing the dilemmas that governmental emergency powers pose to constitutional regimes and explaining some particularities of Colombian (a democracy under permanent emergency), the article focuses on the efforts of the Constitutional Court to exercise a ?material? control of the declaration of a state of emergency by the President. According to this legal doctrine, it is the duty of the Court to analyze if the facts invoked by the government constitute a crisis severe enough to justify the use of emergency powers. The article shows that the Court has exercised this material control in a quite strict way and has nullified several declarations of a state of emergency by different presidents. The article tries then to analyze how this form of judicial review has been possible in a country like Colombia, with a precarious democracy and a cruel armed conflict. The article describes also the impact of this form of judicial control in Colombian politics and offer some more general conclusions based on Colombian experience.

Read More
Post

The Guardianship Reform: Adjust or dismantle?

This article debates the three large controversies stirred up by the guardianship reform. (1) It asks in what measure guardianship has been a factor of congestion and what to do with the possible congestion that it has caused. (2) It asks in what way legal action has caused legal insecurity and has affected the court. (3) Finally it asks whether or not reform is necessary for maintaining guardianship for social rights. The article analyzes these three points and tries to review the situation and the terms of debate in respect to each issue in order to offer perspectives about a solution.

Read More
Post

The uni-diversalidad of the human rights: confliction of rights, concepts of democracy and constitutional interpretation.

The article shows the relationship between the practice of the constitutional interpretation and the problems of the fundamentalism of universality of human rights. The article does a systematic study of Colombian, German, and American constitutional jurisprudence that has resolved the tensions between the right to privacy and the right to freedom of information. It also samples different solutions to the tensions of constitutional democracy. The article maintains that the practical harmonization of those constitutional tensions is a possible to reach through dialogue, a certain universality of human rights and to understand them there needs to be a respect for the diversity of perspectives.

Read More
Post

The block of constitutionality in Colombia: jurisprudential analysis and a trial of the doctrinal systematization.

The text analyzes the evolution of the block of constitutionality in Colombia and it evaluates comparative rights and shows the importance of incorporating it into the national code of human rights standards. After explaining the view of this figure, the text describes its evolution in the Colombian constitutional jurisprudence and analyzes the main conceptual and legal issues that still pose problems, proposing doctrinal solutions that favor application by national judges of the international law of the human rights.

Read More
Post

Global Governance and Labor Rights: Codes of Conduct and Anti-Sweatshop Struggles in Global Apparel Factories in México and Guatemala

Based on ethnographic work of the global clothing factories in Mexico and Guatemala, this article examines both the potential and the limitations of business conduct codes and other forms of rights and governance for the efficient protection of labor rights during times of globalization.

Read More
Powered by swapps
Scroll To Top