Skip to content
Column

An Index and a Thumbs Down

With 50/100 in the Freedom of Expression and Information Index, it’s clear that it is not only risky to be a journalist in our country, but also that all of Colombia is poorly informed.

Read More
Column

Threshold for Peace

A recurrent attack towards the so-called plebiscite for peace is that it would be a rigged tool that seeks to force the citizenry to accept the possible peace accord, as it would reduce the threshold to only to 13%, with which only a minority of four million of the 33 million people that make up the electoral census could impose their vision of peace on all of Colombia.

Read More
Column

Incendiary Language

Elides J. Rojas, a Venezuelan journalist, published in January 2013 a list of the insults that Chavismo has used against the opposition. These are only some of them: nation sellers, rogues, thiefs, worms, dogs, flies, insects, vipers, rats, cowards, necrophiles, blood-suckers, drug addicts, mercenaries, quacks, leeches, puppies of the empire, soulless, pro-yankees, satraps, wretches, bacterias, terrorists, war dogs, messengers of death, intellectual dwarves, spirit killers, sackers, child eaters, slavers, grave diggers, carrion, history’s garbage, etc.

Read More
Post

The strategy of Colombia before the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in the case of the Palace of Justice: ¿poor or malintentioned?

En my previous entry, I showed, without pretending to be exhaustive, some punctual but huge mistakes and contradictions of the pledge of Colombia before the Interamerican Court of Human Rights in the case of the Palace of Justice. In this entry, as I had said, I will analice the strategy of defense. I again apologize for the extent and the excess of technico-juridical arguments, but I think that this examination is necessary.

Read More
Post

They are still disappeared

Colombia sustains before the Interamerican Court of Human Rights that it cannot be condemned for the disappereances of the Palace of Justice, because there are no proofs that show that this 12 people left the Palace alive and that they were disappeared ny a state’s agent. But this thesis is false, both a probatory and at a normative level.

Read More
Post

Arrogant, bur juridically very poor

Few times have I read a document as offensive, in a human sense, as the answer brief of Colombia, elaborated by Rafael Nieto Loaiza, in the case of the Palace of Justice before the Interamerican Court of Human Rights, where the responsibility of the Colombia is judged for the disappearances that happened after the reclaim. And that is why the indignation about that brief of many commentarists, is justified. Indignation that I share.

Read More
Post

An offensive defense

The defense of Nieto Loaisa before the Interamerican Court on the case of the Palace of Justice is truly offensive: instead of being a goor juridical representation of the Colombian State, it is an attack to the national justice, and his brief is an offense to the intelligence, the truth and the victims.

Read More
Post

Carnival and sex

The campaigns on safe sex during the Carnaval de Barranquilla are an example worth following for the rest of the authorities in the country.

Read More
Powered by swapps
Scroll To Top